The Return of Indiana Jones Review: The Film Industry Is Dead And We’re All To Blame

I understand why Hollywood executives are so obsessed with remakes, returns and reboots. They know that the way to make money in films these days is to find something familiar to the ticket-buying audience and regurgitate it on to the screen for two hours.

In fact, we have hit the stage where the less original a film is, the more likely it is to make money.

Don’t believe me? Here’s a chart I totally didn’t just make up to show the correlation between doing the same old sh*t and making money:

Money Making Graph

The dip is for any reboot of The Fantastic Four.

Sure, some very rich people get to make a lot of money off the venture, but as an enthusiast it’s a little depressing. We’ve even reached the point where filmmakers have become so adept at working within the ridiculous confines of only making films people are already familiar with that they are making the formula work really well.

Take 22 Jump Street as an example. Phil Lord and Christopher Miller took an idea that really should have been terrible and made a pretty great film. They did it for the Lego Movie, too. Hell, JJ Abrams made The Force Awakens work despite the incredible pressure he would have been dealing with. We’ve seen the future, and it’s made up of things you already know and have become somewhat bored of.

It’s therefore difficult to blame film execs for going down this route. If you were running the Disney film division of course you would order 8,000 Star Wars films in the next 2 years. You just have to mutter the words “Star Wars” and I start salivating like a Pavlovian dog, so you’d be stupid not to capitalise on that.

But what the hell is the logic for bringing Indiana Jones back?

Look, I’m a massive, massive fan of the original trilogy. Harrison Ford’s portrayal of the titular character is pretty much the definition of cool that I have tried and failed to live by my whole life, and the first film is so enjoyably 1980’s I can barely handle it. While others might see the 80’s as the decade of leggings and Rick Astley, for me it’s all about well-paced, needlessly-violent action adventure films. Of these, Indiana Jones is pretty much at the top of the pile.

But the time for this has come and gone. Were there really people out there who were longing for this to continue? Harrison Ford will be so old by the time the film comes out he will be one of the ancient treasures he has to find.

Harrison Ford

Apologies, Harry, but it’s kind of true.

That may sound like a flippant and unnecessary remark about a man’s age, but it’s important.

Something like Star Wars can be sequel’d in to a galaxy far, far away because that’s the universe it exists in. You could wipe out every character and start again and it would be fine, because are buying in to the idea of “Star Wars” more than they are the character development of Princess Leia. Same with Fast and Furious. The people who go to see this are meat-headed bros who want to see things go fast and explode and stuff (I imagine), and not how Vin Diesel’s character changes and evolves with the scarily escalating adventures he is experiencing.

Indiana Jones, however, is totally different. It’s about the man himself, not the stuff that goes on around him. What makes the original trilogy so great (particular Raiders of the Lost Ark) is that it’s this awesome, cool, handsome guy who runs around punching Nazis and finding mystical treasures. Seriously, look at this guy:

Indiana Jones.gif

Tell me you don’t want to be him. I dare you.

But now? He’ll be 77 by the time this fifth one will come out, so I can only imagine the character will be as well. We already saw him ten years ago being significantly less awesome, are we to really expect that now he has a bus pass and a pension he’s going to be anything even close to as cool and handsome as he was nearly 40 years ago? I don’t know about you, but a retired teacher looking for old artefacts doesn’t sound that exciting to me. It sounds like an episode of Time Team.

All I can presume is that this isn’t actually trying to appeal to anyone. It’s just trying to wave something familiar and nostalgic in front of the noses of an increasingly easier to please audience and watching as they follow the trail like James Woods in Family Guy.

This pattern won’t change as long as we let it. There is zero pressure applied to the industry to come out with something unique or different. Hell, it’s not even looking for original anymore. And why should it? When Furious 7 can be the sixth highest grossing film of all time (!), why the hell would you bother going to the lengths to create something new? The power is in the hands of the consumer, and we’re just handing it back to the industry by doing whatever they want us to do.

Inevitably, this film will make a sh*ttonne of money. We’ll all know that it’s a cheap grab at stealing money from our pockets, but we’ll fall for it anyway. We’ll go to see it, it’ll probably be fine (it couldn’t be worse than Kingdom of the Crystal Skull), and we’ll leave the cinema ready for Ford to reprise his role as an 88 year old in 2030 in Indiana Jones: Search for the Lost Reading Glasses.

And when that happens, we’ll only have ourselves to blame.

The Return of Indiana Jones Rating:

Indiana Jones What

Yeah, you and me both, Indie.

Check back in every Monday and Thursday for the latest reviews.

Follow me on Twitter to stay up-to-date.


7 thoughts on “The Return of Indiana Jones Review: The Film Industry Is Dead And We’re All To Blame

  1. K.L. Allendoerfer says:

    Hmm. I actually liked The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. Maybe it’s a girl thing, or maybe it’s that my name is almost the same as Karen Allen’s. But I liked that sub-plot of Indy’s reunion with Marion Ravenwood and their son “Mutt” It’s an interesting comparison: in contrast to The Force Awakens, in Crystal Skull, Harrison Ford’s character does right by, and reconciles with, the woman he loved in the past. And he has a son who turns out to be sort of a decent person as opposed to an emo mass-murderer.

    Of everything in The Force Awakens (including the silly “blow up the planet killer after getting the shields down” plotline), that part disturbed me the most: that Han and Leia (and probably Luke too) screwed up so badly with Ben, and it didn’t turn out okay. I don’t see how there is ever going to be any redemption for Kylo Ren. Maybe he’ll end up sacrificing himself to save Rey and the rest of the galaxy, but short of that, he’s lost. And that was Han’s last thought, his last moments on earth. It was too dark for me. Anyway, Indiana Jones didn’t go there. And I’m glad.

    But that doesn’t mean I’m interested in another sequel. Is Mutt going to snap and stab Indy to death, too? That would really suck.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. larnerholt says:

      I haven’t seen Kingdom of the Crystal Skull for a while so I’m not a great authority on it, but from memory I felt like it was so close to being a really good film, but missed it through all the silliness. The alien stuff was really stupid, and a lot of it felt quite hokey and childish where Indiana Jones was actually kind of dark in places in the initial trilogy.

      It’s interesting what you say about TFA actually, as I think it might highlight why you and I have such differing views on it as a film. Personally, I love how bleak and dark it gets with Han and Leia having royally screwed up with their son. That’s exactly my kind of media/art – dark, but with signs of light.

      Thinking about it, that’s probably why we have differing views on Crystal Skull, too…

      Thanks for the comment KL, always greatly appreciated.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. K.L. Allendoerfer says:

        I haven’t seen Crystal Skull for a long time either, but maybe it would have made more sense thematically if the sons had been reversed, and Indiana Jones had had an evil son, because you’re right, that trilogy already takes the character to some dark places. Indy had been weak and craven before when it came to relationships.

        Luke hadn’t been, though. He was supposed to be different from his father. And Han was supposed to have changed.

        I felt like the planetary destruction and patricide in the Force Awakens negated everything good in the first 3 movies. It all came to naught, even Luke’s refusal to join the dark side and his ultimate redemption of Vader. And Luke and Han were both cowards, which doesn’t really square with their characters in the original trilogy.

        There’s a FB meme showing a picture of Leia that says, “Friendly reminder that Leia has lost her adoptive parents, entire planet, father, husband, son and been abandoned by her brother and yet has never been tempted by the dark side even once. Take notes Skywalker boys. Y’all weak as shit.”

        Liked by 1 person

      2. larnerholt says:

        I don’t know, I kind of like that about Star Wars. Luke and Han messed up so badly they completely gave up. That’s how bad it got. Meanwhile. Leia stays true to who she is and keeps fighting. That’s cool.

        In fact, given what all three were like when they first met in the Death Star in A New Hope, I’d say this is pretty much consistent characterisation, not the opposite. Leia always was the strong one.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s